So many of you, I’m sure, have
heard of a little website called “College Confidential”
It’s a message board centered
around, what else, college life.
Mainly college admissions, but also various other college-y topics.
Mainly college admissions, but also various other college-y topics.
There are many excellent uses of
the site, which I’ll post about another day. But that’s not what this is about…
Today I’m going to talk a bit about
the common “Chance Me” threads and why I think they’re a bit… overrated.
So a typical “Chance Me” thread is
written by a high school senior or junior who will list their stats and the
schools they’re applying to. The idea is to get opinions on their chances of
admissions.
Unfortunately, these students will
often get their egos inflated by anonymous, like-minded, college application overachievers.
But when they don’t get into every school people said they would, they
ultimately end up disappointed and confused.
So today I’ll give you three
reasons that “Chance Me” threads aren’t accurate.
I will tell you, quite honestly,
that I’ve probably read over a hundred of these threads. They’re generally by
overachieving students with stellar GPA and SAT scores, good rigor, and lots of
activities .
The thing that really confuses me
is how every single one of these students has “excellent recs” and “excellent
essays”
Well… According to whom?
You don’t get to see your recommendations at most schools (I know I didn’t, school policy). And while most teachers won’t agree to write you a rec unless they have positive things to say about you, but these overachieving students might believe their recommendations will be:
“He was the brightest student I’ve ever had, he is the messiah of pre-calculus, also he’s incredibly good looking and smells good”
Well… According to whom?
You don’t get to see your recommendations at most schools (I know I didn’t, school policy). And while most teachers won’t agree to write you a rec unless they have positive things to say about you, but these overachieving students might believe their recommendations will be:
“He was the brightest student I’ve ever had, he is the messiah of pre-calculus, also he’s incredibly good looking and smells good”
When the rec is really more like:
“He has natural ability at math
above many of his peers, but this can make him a bit pretentious times. If he’s
being challenged he’ll be great, but he has no patience for review. Overall
though, he is a very bright student”
Good, but not stellar.
And essays are the same way.
Do you know that in 2010 40 percent
of college students rated their writing abilities above average? (article)
While being above the 50th percentile makes you “above average” how many of you would rate being in the 51st percentile as excellent?
Yeah… I thought so.
While being above the 50th percentile makes you “above average” how many of you would rate being in the 51st percentile as excellent?
Yeah… I thought so.
I have run across so many college
applicants who think their essays are stellar, when really they’re just meh. They’re fine. They demonstrate a
capable writer, but life changing? Not so much.
This also applies to art
submissions. The faculty of the department rates art submissions, and the
rating is based on this student compared
to the undergraduates currently at the school. Being the best in your high
school doesn’t mean you’re the best compared to other high schools, and
especially college students. But nobody sends in an arts submission thinking
they’re average.
These students overestimate their
soft statistics to a huge degree. And on that note…
Users who evaluate “chance me”
threads usually look really hard at the GPA and SAT scores. Generally if the
writer is in the middle 50 percent or above they “have a chance”
But this doesn’t factor in the soft factors. Evaluators usually skim the extracurriculars for 1. NHS membership 2. Some leadership and 3. Community service.
But this doesn’t factor in the soft factors. Evaluators usually skim the extracurriculars for 1. NHS membership 2. Some leadership and 3. Community service.
But without the hours/week count,
the ranked ordering of activities by priority, and the descriptions of membership/leadership
responsibilities.
And these can be huge factors in admissions decisions.
And these can be huge factors in admissions decisions.
Context is another really big
factor.
For instance, these threads usually
have a lot of AP classes and dual enrollment classes. Both are considered to be
strong on College Confidential.
But take context into consideration….
For example:
If someone from the high school I attended listed mostly dual enrollment classes, they would not be looking at Ivy League schools. Or even top tier schools. Dual enrollment classes in my high school were considered to be the middle ground between the remedial classes and the AP classes. They were not bad per-se but they certainly weren’t impressive.
Similarly, some schools offer
bucket-fulls of AP classes, so that taking less than 5 is considered weak. Some
only offer 2 or 3, so even one AP class is impressive.
And other soft factors that are usually under valued:
Race.
Going to A: over generalize and B: call a spade a spade.
Race plays a bigger role than most
schools would like to admit. Being white can limit you. Or, heaven forbid,
being an Over-Represented Minority can actually hurt you. The standards will be higher because there are more of
you to choose from. I’m looking at you East Asians, Indians, and Jews (in the
north-east at least).
And finally, finances.
If you’re looking at a need-blind
school, this isn’t really as much of an issue.
But for a school that will take financial status into play?
I’m sorry to say that you might be at a disadvantage if you can’t pay. If its
between you and someone who is identical except they can pay a full ride, the
full ride student will probably win. There is nothing you can do about this. I
will say it a million times, a school you can afford is the most valuable thing
you will find in your college search.
This isn’t to say hard factors
aren’t important. But generally speaking, hard factors will keep your
application in the pile. Soft factors will get you in.
And finally. There is no formula or
way to know exactly who is getting in or not. If there were there would be no
admissions reps. Maybe a school needs a French Horn player for the wind
symphony, or some more tennis players.
The applicants won’t know that. And that can make a huge difference.
The applicants won’t know that. And that can make a huge difference.
The hard truth is there is no way
to really know because you’re not an admissions person.
So what you have to do is hedge your bets. Be the best applicant you can be. And cross your fingers that lady luck is on your side.
Because many of these schools you
can be overqualified, and it still won’t be enough. Hard sad truth ladies and gentleman.
College Confidential has a lot of
really great uses.
But “Chance Me” threads are highly overrated.
But “Chance Me” threads are highly overrated.
No comments:
Post a Comment